Legal Opinion

Diaz v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 5, 1966No. 21868PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error, herein referred to as the defendant, was tried before a jury and found guilty on the four counts of burglary, larceny, and conspiracies to commit burglary and larceny. A motion for a new trial was overruled and the defendant duly sentenced as provided by law. Pie is here by writ of error and advocates two grounds for reversal, namely:

1. There was insufficient evidence to identify defendant as the perpetrator of the crimes charged.

2. There was insufficient, and improper, evidence introduced to establish defendant’s previous conviction of a felony.

The evidence in the record…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Militello v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  2. Davis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  3. Hampton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. Wilcox v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  5. Conferti v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. ChavezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. People v. AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Candelaria v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. People v. YeagerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  5. People v. BuenoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API