Conferti v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
Coneerti was convicted of possession of intoxicating liquor, comes here on error, and moves for -a supersedeas.
It is claimed: (1) That certain exhibits were improperly admitted in evidence; (2) that the evidence is insufficient to convict.
1. A soft drink place, No. 183 South Santa Pe Avenue, Pueblo, was raided by the police, June 23, 1925, and about fifty-two gallons of whisky were found. The police found there bottles which belonged to defendant, cancelled checks drawn by him, bills purporting to be for goods sold to him, some of them receipted, and other property of his. These were the…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Gonzales v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Corbett v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Keller v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Militello v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
- Davis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.