Legal Opinion

Militello v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 29, 1934No. 13,381PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was convicted of arson and sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of two and one-half to five years. To review that judgment he prosecutes this writ. The errors assigned are grouped and argued under the following heads: (1) The evidence does not sustain the verdict; (2) improper evidence was admitted; (3) proper evidence was excluded; (4) erroneous instructions were given; (5) essential instructions were refused.

1. The information charged defendant with burning property which was “then and there being insured against damage and loss…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ins. Co. of Des Moines v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. King v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  3. Conferti v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  4. Holt v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  5. Banas v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hampton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  2. Gonzales v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  3. Mathis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. Corbett v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  5. Cahill v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API