Legal Opinion

Davis v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 17, 1958No. 18377PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

Plaintiff in error, along with a co-defendant (not a party to this writ of error), was convicted of the crime of burglary in the Denver district court. We will refer to plaintiff in error as defendant or as Davis.

Judgment and sentence were entered as a result of jury verdict of guilty. Motion for new trial was denied and defendant seeks reversal on the ground that the conviction was based on circumstantial evidence alone and the court erred in not directing a verdict of acquittal at the close of the People’s case. No evidence was offered by defendant in his own behalf.

The facts are not in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lem Woon v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. State v. RichettiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. State v. KleierIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  4. O'Loughlin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  5. Commonwealth v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Corbett v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Wells v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  3. Keller v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. People v. McClendonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. Ciccarelli v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API