Legal Opinion
United States v. Hoffmann
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided February 18, 2016No. 15-0361/MCPublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Could;. 1
Government investigators collected electronic media during a consent search of Appellant’s barracks room. During the collection process, Appellant withdrew his consent. Nevertheless, the investigators seized the electronic media. The following day Appellant formally revoked his consent in writing and demanded the return of all property in the Government’s possession without it being searched.; We granted review to determine whether the military judge erred in refusing to suppress the fruit of a search of the seized media made pursuant to a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. GurczynskiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. DarnallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. RobinsonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- People v. FlynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- United States v. ArmendarizNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.