Legal Opinion

Roche v. Baldwin

California Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1904No. S.F. No. 3623PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

Plaintiff sues as the assignee of Henry E. Highton to recover the reasonable value'of the services of-said Highton performed as an attorney for defendant. A jury returned a general verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $7,727.10. On defendant’s motion for a new trial the court ordered that the motion be-granted unless plaintiff should remit one thousand dollars from the verdict and judgment entered thereon. The plaintiff consented to remit the said amount, thus reducing the judgment to $6,727.10, besides costs, and thereafter the court denied the motion for a new trial.

The defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Knight v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Thornton v. HookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Braly v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Miller v. Campbell, Warburton, Fitzsimmons, Smith, Mendel & PastoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Pickens Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Mounsey v. BowerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API