Legal Opinion
Long v. Saufley
California Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1891No. 13273PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court
— The judgment in this case has been heretofore affirmed by this court. (79 Cal. 260.) The present appeal is from an order denying a new trial. The action was brought upon the following agreement, *438executed by the defendant to Janies H. Long, the assignor of the plaintiff: —
“San Feancisco, April 7, 1885.
“For value received, I hereby agree to pay to J. H. Long, or order, the sum of five hundred ($500) dollars out of money collected on judgment in action of Frank v. Kilbourn et al.,No. 13636, Superior Court City and County of San Francisco, Department bio. 7, provided that said money…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Long v. SaufleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bruce v. BruceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Aydelotte v. BloomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Ames v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1904