Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Bush

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1963No. Civ. 20339PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from judgment based on order granting summary judgment.

Question Presented

Was any triable issue of fact presented ?

Record

Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that he is an attorney at law, and that within two years preceding the commencement of the action defendants became indebted to him in the sum of $20,000 as the reasonable value of services rendered by plaintiff “to and for the use and benefit of defendants and at their special instance and request.” Defendants7 demurrer to the effect that the alleged cause of action had been adjudicated by the San Francisco Superior Court was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Snider v. SniderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. FishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Estate of JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Wiler v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Estate of TryninCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Miller v. Campbell, Warburton, Fitzsimmons, Smith, Mendel & PastoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API