Dugas v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether, in calculating the amount due an insured from uninsured motorist coverage, the insurer may deduct the entire amount of reparations benefits previously paid to the insured, or whether the deduction for previously paid reparations benefits must be reduced to reflect the insurer’s contribution to attorney’s fees incurred by the insured in effecting a recovery from the tortfeasor. The trial court concluded that the carrier was required to contribute to the insured’s legal fees. The Appellate Court affirmed the trial court’s judgment. We now reverse.
Th…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Texaco Refining & Marketing Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Warner v. Leslie-Elliott Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Bouley v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Hansen v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Wilson v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Orkney v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.