Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Ann Arbor Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Shiawassee; Smith, J. Case by Marshall Thomas against the Ann Arbor Railroad Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff against defendant to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him by the falling of a bridge being put in over the Saline river at Milan, Monroe county, Mich., on defendant’s right of way, while plaintiff was in the employ of defendant as laborer in putting in said bridge. Plaintiff and other laborers like himself, at the time he was injured, were under the charge and control of one Thomas Turnbull, who had full charge, management, and control, of the men and work. The work of getting the foundation of the bridge ready and preparing the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Probst v. . DelamaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Beesley v. F. W. Wheeler & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Ferren v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Schroeder v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Ross v. Township of IoniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McKernan v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Kaukola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Kerker ex rel. Kerker v. Bettendorf Metal Wheel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. McLean v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. J. R. Hanify Co. v. WestbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API