Legal Opinion

Kerker ex rel. Kerker v. Bettendorf Metal Wheel Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 20, 1908PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Bcott District Court. — Hon. J. W. Bollinger, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for personal injury. There was a directed verdict for tbe defendant, and from the judgment entered thereon, the plaintiff appeals. — ■

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

— The defendant owns and operates a plant for the production of metal wheels used in various kinds of machinery. The business, or some portion of it, is carried on in a 'shop about three hundred and seventy feet long, different parts of which are devoted to different branches of the work required in turning’ out the finished product. About two years prior to the accident complained of Noy Kerker, then a boy of sixteen years, entered the defendant’s employ, and during most of that period worked at or with a device known as a “shoulder machine” near one end of the shop. During the same period…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Leary v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. Ross v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Jones v. Florence Mining Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hollenbeck v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. State ex inf. Crow v. VallinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Umsted ex rel. Umsted v. Colgate Farmers Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Wilks v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Haskell v. L. H. Kurtz Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Hitchcock v. Arctic Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  5. Kimmerle v. Dubuque Altar Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API