Beesley v. F. W. Wheeler & Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The defendant is engaged in building-steel vessels, in the construction of which scaffolds are necessary at various stages of the work. It employs about 800 men, of various trades, including fitters, bolters, chippers, drillers, riveters, searchers, and carpenters. These men are continuously employed, and all are subject to the control of the superintendent. The labor is divided among the artisans, and to the carpenters is apportioned the building of scaffolds, though they are sometimes assisted by others. The plaintiff, a searcher, — i. e., one who goes over the work, and supplies omitted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Flike v. . Boston and Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Ford v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Mulchey v. Methodist Religious SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Slater v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- VanDusen v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Callan v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Petaja v. Aurora Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Forbes v. DunnavantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Combs v. Rountree Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- McDonald v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.