Legal Opinion

Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dickie

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 16, 2002No. 20249-6-IIIPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

Appellant landowners, Dyke and Jane Doe Dickie, argue the trial court erred when (A) applying a right-of-way easement held by the Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District for the enlargement and maintenance of a long established irrigation lateral, and (B) entering a mandatory injunction requiring them to remove property from within the right-of-way. We adopt a rule followed elsewhere permitting parties to contract for an easement to take effect or be enjoyed in the future. Under our facts, the rule applied to permit the enlargement of both the lateral and the necessary adjacent maintenance area.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Nguyen v. STATE HEALTH MED. QUALITY ASSUR.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Nguyen v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Veach v. CulpWashington Supreme Court · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Newport Yacht Basin Ass'n of Condominium Owners v. Supreme Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Sunnyside Valley Irr. Dist. v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Buck Mountain Owners' Ass'n v. PrestwichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Saviano v. Westport Amusements, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API