Legal Opinion

Buck Mountain Owners' Ass'n v. Prestwich

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 4, 2013No. 67714-4-IPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLau, J.

¶1 — Absent an agreement, joint users of a common roadway are obligated to contribute to the costs reasonably incurred for repair and maintenance of the roadway. In this declaratory judgment action, Barbara Bentley and Glenn Prestwich (Bentley-Prestwich) contend *708they have no obligation to share repair and maintenance costs for a roadway they indisputably use for ingress and egress. In the alternative, they argue that any obligation imposed should be calculated based on their actual use of the roadway. After a six-day bench trial, the trial court entered judgment against Bentley-Prestwich for…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. William D. MorganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. Donner v. BlueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Village Green Condominium Ass'n v. HodgesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  4. Philip D. Burgess And Linda L. Burgess, Res. v. Rowena Crossan, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Atm Shafiqul Khalid And Xencare Software, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API