P. J. Bowlin Liquor Co. v. Brandenburg
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Butler District Court.— Hon. C. H. Kelly, Judge. Action at law on account for merchandise, sold and delivered. There was a directed verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The petition declares upon an account for liquors alleged to have been sold to the defendant in the state of Minnesota. In addition to a general denial, the defendant pleads: First, that the sale of liquors, or a large part thereof, for which payment is claimed, were sold to defendant on.Sunday; and, second, that all of said liquors were sold to plaintiff with the intent and for the purpose, that they should, be re-sold in this state, contrary to the statutes in such case made and provided.
1. Sunday con-Son.1’ ra" ca I. The evidence discloses that plaintiff company is a wholesale liquor…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wind v. Iler & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Kountz v. PriceMississippi Supreme Court · 1866
- Russell & Co. v. MurdockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Bell v. MahinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Gross v. FeehanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hamill v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Frankel v. HillierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Service System, Inc. v. JohnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Hirtz v. KoppesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.