Legal Opinion

Kountz v. Price

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1866PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Ebeoe to Special Court of Equity at J ackson. Hon. George T. Swann, judge. The facts of the case are fully stated in the opinion of the court. contended, 1. That though the salt was delivered on Sunday, yet the note was not executed until some time afterwards, and is therefore not void. 2. That defendants in error insisted that the contract for the exchange of the salt was made on Sunday, and therefore void.

Read the full summary

Ebeoe to Special Court of Equity at J ackson. Hon. George T. Swann, judge. The facts of the case are fully stated in the opinion of the court. contended, 1. That though the salt was delivered on Sunday, yet the note was not executed until some time afterwards, and is therefore not void. 2. That defendants in error insisted that the contract for the exchange of the salt was made on Sunday, and therefore void. If this be so, then the title to the salt never passed to defendants, and remained in Kountz, and Dickson and Price being in possession, it could have been recovered of them in an action…

1Opinion of the Court

Handy, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court..

The appellant filed his petition in the Special Court of *343Equity against tbe appellees, praying tbe specific performance of a contract in tbe following words :

JACKSON, December 8, 1864.

Due John Kountz, 9 bales cotton.

C. R. DicKsoN and N. PmcE.

Alleging that said due-bill was executed in consideration of an agreement made by said Dickson and Price with the agent of petitioner for an exchange of salt for cotton, pound'for pound, and that said agent delivered to them five thousand one hundred and twenty pounds of salt, belonging to petitioner, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Henderson v. Bank at MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1847

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Grapico Bottling Co. v. EnnisMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Troewert v. DeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Tucker v. WestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1874
  5. Block v. McMurryMississippi Supreme Court · 1878

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API