Wind v. Iler & Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mills District Court. — How. N. W. Macy, Judge. Action at law to recover1 money paid by plaintiff to defendants for intoxicating liquors during the years 1881,1882,1883, and 1884. There- was a trial to a jury, and at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, defendants moved the court for a verdict. The motion was sustained, and verdict and judgment rendered for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
Plaintiff is a copartnership composed of N. P. Wind and George F. Silvers, heretofore, and during the years 1881, 1882,1888, and 1884, doing business as wholesale and retail liquor dealers in the city of Ottumwa, Iowa. Defendant Her & Co. is a copart-nership composed of the other defendants, doing a wholesale liquor business in the city of Omaha, Nelb. Sometime during the latter part of the year 1881’ defendants’ traveling man, one Gilmore, called upon the plaintiff at their place of business in Ottumwa to induce 1 them to order some liquors from the firm which he represented. The evidence…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hunt v. WymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Tegler & Co. v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Union Portland Cement Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Greacen v. . PoehlmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Hamilton v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- McGregor v. ConeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Hamilton v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.