Legal Opinion · Dissent

Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1937No. 31,170Published

1Dissent

Holt, Stone, and Olson, Justices

(dissenting).

Modern means of fast transportation, especially since the advent of the automobile, and the consequent need for regulation thereof have combined to bring about much in the way of statutory rules applicable thereto. Citizens are in general familiar with the necessity of such; also, that many requirements have been adopted from time to time by state and municipal authorities to safeguard the public who have occasion to use our thoroughfares. That the field is one for legislative activity everyone will concede. Many and varied rules of conduct have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Beeck v. Sabine Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. v. M. St. P. S. S. M. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Olson v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. State v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API