Legal Opinion

Stott v. Stott Realty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1943No. Docket No. 30, Calendar No. 41,916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjshnell, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff, Arthur Stott* from a judgment of no cause of action, entered on defendant Stott Realty Company’s motion for a directed verdict. Plaintiff’s action is in assumpsit to recover from dividends collected by defendant company on securities that were pledged to it by plaintiff as collateral for loans. The determination of the matters in dispute depends upon the interpretation of the several loan agreements.

Upon the death of plaintiff’s father, David Stott, practically all of the stock of the defendant corporation passed to his testamentary trustees. The beneficiaries…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Agricultural Life Ins. Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Baker v. BairdMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Ginsberg v. Reliable Linen Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Gaydos v. White Motor Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Biever Motor Car Co. v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1952
  4. Turner Holdings, Inc. v. Howard Miller Clock Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
  5. Lamont v. Burdett Oxygen Co. of Cleveland, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API