Legal Opinion
Biever Motor Car Co. v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 16, 1952No. Civ. A. 3194PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, Chief Judge.
This is an action for breach of contract. The plaintiff, “Biever”, was for many years a Chrysler dealer in New Haven. On August 29, 1944 Biever and Chrysler executed two written agreements: an “Agreement Between Chrysler Direct Dealer and Chrysler Corporation, Chrysler Division’’, and a “Chrysler Direct Dealer-Retail Memorandum of Sales Area.” Both agreements were in the form of printed booklets.. They superseded other agreements which had previously -been in effect between the parties.
The “Memorandum of Sales Area”, which was made to be subject to the terms and conditions…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wood Motor Co. v. NebelTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Bushwick-Decatur Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- J. R. Watkins Co. v. RichMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Sheldon-Seatz, Inc. v. ColesMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- F. H. McClintock Co. v. Truxell Sales & Service, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- A. S. Rampell, Inc. v. Hyster Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Gambar Enterprises, Inc. v. Kelly Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Perlman v. FeldmannDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
- Rubinger v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.