Legal Opinion
Gaydos v. White Motor Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 1974No. Docket 17269PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolbrook, J.
The plaintiffs, numbering 135, in this action were former employees of defendant White Motor Corporation. They had been employed by defendant for a period of at least six months prior to July 1, 1971. They were employees of what was designated as the P.E.C. Unit, a part of the Diamond Reo Truck Division of defendant. That unit maintained facilities in Chicago, Illinois, and in Lansing, Michigan. Thirty-six of the plaintiffs were employed in Lansing and the remainder in Chicago.
On July 1, 1971, the P.E.C. Unit was sold by defendant to AM General Corporation. Included in the sale agreement was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Hercules Powder Co. v. Brookfield.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Adams v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Cain v. Allen Electric & Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Chinn v. China National Aviation Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Dahl v. Brunswick Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Helle v. Landmark, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.