Baker v. Baird
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This-suit was tried by the court without a jury. The judge made an elaborate finding of facts, substantially as follows:
Defendant was formerly deputy inspector and collector of customs at Algonac, Mich. Hnder sections 2733, 2738, Rev. Stat. H. S., he was entitled to receive pay at three dollars per day from June 22, 1874, to May 5, 1880, and had a claim against the government for the difference between that and $420 per year, which the government had paid. In 1875, plaintiff commenced a correspondence with defendant, soliciting employment to prosecute this claim. The correspondence continued…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Finlay v. SwirskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Weaver v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Muir v. Leonard Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- In Re Estate of ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- In re National Grocer Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.