Legal Opinion

Moore v. Madigan

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided March 30, 1992No. 91-0029-CV-W-2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GAITAN, District Judge.

This case is an appeal from an administrative agency decision before the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the USDA decision to withdraw plaintiff’s status as a “specifically approved stockyard” for a period of five years pursuant to Title 9, Code of Federal Regulations § 78.44 (1991). Pending before this Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. 1 Jurisdiction for this case is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

I. THE FACTS

In 1903, Congress enacted the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trifid Corp. v. National Imagery and Mapping AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1998
  2. Horn Farms, Inc. v. VenemanDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2004
  3. Moore v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Martins v. MRG of South Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Moore v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API