Legal Opinion
Moore v. Madigan
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1993No. 92-2272PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation).
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) suspended the “specifically-approved stockyard status” (SASS) of Joplin Regional Stockyards, Inc. (JRS). USDA reached its decision after conducting an informal hearing at which a hearing officer found that various people repeatedly violated USDA’s brucellosis regulations on JRS’s premises. JRS and its legally-responsible operator, Jackie Moore, sued USDA for declaratory and injunctive relief. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Webster Groves Trust Co. v. SaxonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- City of West Chicago, Illinois v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Kerr-Mcgee Chemical Corporation, Intervening City of West Chicago v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Kerr-Mcgee Chemical Corporation and R.G. PageCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Air Transport Ass'n of America v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Jacob F. Bosma D/B/A Chino Livestock Commission Company and Yardage v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lane v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Moore v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993