Legal Opinion

Falk v. Salario

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 24, 1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

The original declaration was upon a promissory note of L. Salario. Fourteen other persons were joined as defendants upon the allegation that Salario in executing the note acted for himself and them and each of them. The breach alleged is that neither of the defendants paid the note, wherefore on account of its terms the defendants jointly and severally owe the debt and are obligated to pay attorneys’ fees because the note has been placed in the hands of an attorney for collection.

Two of the defendants, Buffa and Cracowaner, who did not sign the note demurred separately to the declaration.

Three…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. McKitrickCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  2. Bingham v. KimballIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Vandeventer v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dee v. Southern Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941
  2. Merchants & Bankers Guaranty Co. v. DownsSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Marinelli v. WeaverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Fancher v. RumseySupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. L & S ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Miami Tile & Terrazzo, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API