Legal Opinion

Hudson-Houston Lbr. Co. v. First State Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 27, 1928No. 17675PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENNETT, C.

This was a civil action wherein Hudson-Houston Lumber Company was plaintiff, and J. S. Melton, Frank Blevins and First State Bank of Ringling were defendants, and Mrs. Belle Melton later became a party as intervener.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in trial court. Plaintiff’s petition alleged that, on the 1st day of May, 1922, J. S. Melton, for a valuable consideration executed and delivered to plaintiff his promissory note for $594.S0 due October 15, 1922, with interest and attorney’s fee, and lhat as a part of same transaction and for the purpose of securing…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Thames & Co. v. Rembert's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Gilchrist v. GoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Prentice v. Zane's Administrator.Supreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. Cook v. Parham & BluntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  5. Sawyer v. BahnsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Ross v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Cole v. UlreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. A & S DISTRIBUTING COMPANY v. Nall-Tucker, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Abraham v. American Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API