Gonzales v. Google, Inc.
District Court, D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
WARE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case raises three vital interests: (1) the national interest in a judicial system to reach informed decisions through the power of a subpoena to compel a third party to produce relevant information; (2) the third-party’s interest in not being compelled by a subpoena to reveal confidential business information and devote resources to a distant *678litigation; and (3) the interest of individuals in freedom from general surveillance by the Government of their use…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Federal Open Market Committee of Federal Reserve System v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America, Inc. v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- ATS Products, Inc. v. Champion Fiberglass, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Meredith v. United Collection Bureau, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
- United States v. Golden Valley Electric AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Innovative Therapies, Inc. v. MeentsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.