Legal Opinion

Innovative Therapies, Inc. v. Meents

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 4, 2014No. Civil Action No. DKC 12-3309PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge.

Presently pending and ready for review in this declaratory judgment action are several motions, including: (1) the motion of Plaintiff Innovative Therapies, Inc. (“ITI” or “Plaintiff’) for a protective order (ECF No. 21); (2) Plaintiffs motion to modify a subpoena (ECF No. 24); (3) the motion of Defendant Mark S. Meents (“Meents” or “Defendant”) for extension of time to complete discovery (ECF No. 27); and (4) Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 35). The issues have been fully briefed, and the court now rules, no…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Harig v. Progress Rail Services Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  2. Blankenship v. Fox News Network, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2021
  3. COVIL CORPORATION v. USF&G COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021
  4. Cai Design Inc. v. Phoenix Federal 2 Mining LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2021
  5. Clarendon Regency IV, LLC v. Equinox Clarendon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API