Legal Opinion

C., N. O. & T. P. R. R. v. Owsley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 27, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Lincoln Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clarke

Reversing.

*662McKinney is a town of about five hundred inhabitants. Its Main street, running east and west, is intersected at right angles by the appellant railroad company’s main and passing tracks and a spur track known in this record as the mill track. The passing track and the mill track join the main track at a switch, a short distance south of Main street. The mill track runs nearly parallel to the other two tracks north of Main street some distance past the McKinney Mill Company’s flour mill, which is about ninety feet north of Main street and faces the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Warnock's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Sou. Ry. v. Caplinger's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Dawson's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Corder's Administrator v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Adkins' Admr. v. Big Sandy & Cumberland RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  3. Melvin v. CaterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
  5. Hollifield's Administratrix v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API