Legal Opinion

Patten v. Fitz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 10, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.

This is an action of contract for breach of a covenant against incumbrances in a deed from the defendant to the plaintiff. The material facts are as follows:

The defendant was the owner of a lot of land on Austin Street, in Somerville, a private way which had been used by those abutting on it for many years. In April, 1882, the defendant and others petitioned the city of Somerville to lay out said Austin Street as a public way. In May, 1882, the defendant, with other abutters, executed an agreement with the city, under seal, by which they stipulated that they would not claim *457any damages on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Ryder v. Town of LexingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Webster v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Schafroth v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  5. Briggs v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API