Legal Opinion

Webster v. City of Lowell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The petitioner’s intestate, Mary E. Webster, was the owner of real estate situated on a public street. Before her death the city of Lowell discontinued the street. The only question which seems to be raised in this case is whether the administrator is the proper party to petition the county commissioners or the Superior Court for a jury to assess the damages for the discontinuance.

F. T. G-reenhalge, for the petitioner. IV". D. Pratt Q. S. IAlley, for the respondent, submitted the case without argument.

The claim for damages is a chose in action, which the owner in her lifetime…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Patten v. FitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Ryder v. Town of LexingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Natick Gas Light Co. v. Inhabitants of NatickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. Markiewicus v. Town of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Howland v. Inhabitants of GreenfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API