Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Treasurer & Receiver General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 16, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This is an action of contract under R. L. c. 128, §§ 95,* 96, to recover compensation out of the assurance fund created under other sections of that act, for the wrongful registration of a parcel of land as the land of the New England Structural Company. We do not find it necessary to consider the many important and interesting questions which were argued at the bar.

The short answer to the plaintiff’s claim is that when the parcel of land in question was erroneously registered (if it was erroneously registered) the plaintiff was not the owner of it.

The decree of registration was made by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Putnam v. StoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Patten v. FitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  3. Isele v. SchwambMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howland v. Inhabitants of GreenfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Overly v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Studley v. KipMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API