Legal Opinion

Jones v. Board of Aldermen

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 15, 1870PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

These are petitions for writs of certiorari to quash the proceedings of the board of aldermen of Boston in the matters of the widening of Matthews Street and High Street in *463that city. In two of the cases, the proceedings were commenced in 1867, — before the amendment of the St. of 1866, c. 174,* *464by be St. of 1868, c. 276; * in the other two, the proceedings were commenced after the St. of 1868, c. 276, went into effect.

I. We will first consider the questions raised in the two cases first referred to.

1. The first objection, made by the petitioners to the validity of the proceedings, is, that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pickford v. Mayor & Aldermen of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Carr v. DooleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Morrison v. MoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Holt v. City CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  5. Blackie v. HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API