Legal Opinion

Allison v. Merris

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1985No. 333PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The only issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly struck a default judgment entered by the prothon*573otary upon praecipe of the plaintiff after the defendants had tardily filed an answer. Because plaintiffs default judgment was entered after an answer had been filed, we hold that it was patently defective and affirm the order causing it to be stricken.

Allen M. Allison was employed by Stephen and Patricia Merris to remodel the Merris home. A dispute arose concerning Allison’s performance and Merris’ obligation to pay therefor. After Allison had recovered the sum of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paulish v. BakaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Fisher v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Ruehl v. Maxwell Steel Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Township of Middletown v. Fried & Gerber, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Gee v. CaffarellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. Cross Creek CondominiumsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Boarts v. McCordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Francisco v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Joyce v. Safeguard Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Jamison v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API