Legal Opinion

Joyce v. Safeguard Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1987No. 3363PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, Judge:

This appeal has been taken from an order which denied appellant’s motion for leave to file an answer and new matter. Appellant claims that the trial court erred as a matter of law when it denied the motion solely because it was untimely, without regard to whether the appellee had been prejudiced by the delay. Alternatively, appellant claims that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to balance the equities of the situation prior to denying the motion. We affirm.

This litigation began on January 7, 1980, when appellee filed a complaint. More than eight months later, on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Bata v. Central-Penn National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Paulish v. BakaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Biglan v. BiglanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Peters Creek Sanitary Authority v. WelchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Horowitz v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Ambrose v. Cross Creek CondominiumsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Francisco v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Schaffer v. Litton Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API