Legal Opinion

Ambrose v. Cross Creek Condominiums

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 1992No. 1091PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Joseph and Janet Ambrose, húsband and wife (Plaintiffs), appeal from an order which simultaneously overruled their preliminary objections to the preliminary objections of Cross Creek Condominiums (Defendant), and dismissed Plaintiffs’ complaint with prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction over Defendant. We are asked to decide whether a written agreement for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading arose from an exchange of letters between the parties, and whether such an agreement could operate as a waiver of Defendant’s right to challenge personal jurisdiction…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Farinacci v. Beaver County Industrial Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Monaco v. Montgomery Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Bata v. Central-Penn National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Paulish v. BakaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hart v. O'MALLEYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Baker v. Cambridge Chase, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Ellenbogen v. PNC Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Gale v. Mercy Catholic Medical Center Eastwick, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Chester Upland School District v. YesavageCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API