Ruehl v. Maxwell Steel Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
This matter comes to us on appeal from an order striking a judgment entered against a garnishee because of admissions contained in answers to interrogatories. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, we affirm the striking of that part of the judgment which exceeds $7,026.77.
Litigation between the Voest-Alpine International Corporation and Maxwell Steel Company was settled when Maxwell Steel executed and delivered to Voest-Alpine a judg ment note for $28,060.33. On November 7, 1980, after Maxwell Steel had defaulted in making payments required by the terms of the note,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Romberger v. RombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Malakoff v. Zambar, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Linett v. LinettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Parliament Industries, Inc. v. William H. Vaughan & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Advance Building Services Co. v. F & M Schaefer Brewing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fidelity Bank v. Commonwealth Marine & General Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Allison v. MerrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Nobel Well Service, Inc. v. Penn Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Clymire v. McKivitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Skonieczny v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.