Legal Opinion

Ruehl v. Maxwell Steel Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1984No. 272PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

This matter comes to us on appeal from an order striking a judgment entered against a garnishee because of admissions contained in answers to interrogatories. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, we affirm the striking of that part of the judgment which exceeds $7,026.77.

Litigation between the Voest-Alpine International Corporation and Maxwell Steel Company was settled when Maxwell Steel executed and delivered to Voest-Alpine a judg ment note for $28,060.33. On November 7, 1980, after Maxwell Steel had defaulted in making payments required by the terms of the note,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Romberger v. RombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Malakoff v. Zambar, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Linett v. LinettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Parliament Industries, Inc. v. William H. Vaughan & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Advance Building Services Co. v. F & M Schaefer Brewing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fidelity Bank v. Commonwealth Marine & General Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Allison v. MerrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Nobel Well Service, Inc. v. Penn Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Clymire v. McKivitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Skonieczny v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API