Lincoln Interagency Narcotics Team v. Kitzhaber
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*529BREWER, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, ORS 28.010 - 28.160, challenging the constitutionality of Ballot Measure 3 (2000) (Measure 3 or Oregon Property Protection Act).1 Measure 3 added section 10 to Article XV of the Oregon Constitution. Section 10 consists of 12 subsections. Plaintiffs argued that Measure 3 contains two or more constitutional amendments that should have been voted on separately under Article XVII, section 1, of the Oregon Constitution.2 Plaintiffs also argued that Measure 3 addresses more than one subject, in violation of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Lehman v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Californians for an Open Primary v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Scott v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Lincoln Interagency Narcotics Team v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Meyer v. BradburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Californians for an Open Primary v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.