Legal Opinion

Lincoln Interagency Narcotics Team v. Kitzhaber

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 9, 2003No. 00C-19878; A115401PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*529BREWER, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, ORS 28.010 - 28.160, challenging the constitutionality of Ballot Measure 3 (2000) (Measure 3 or Oregon Property Protection Act).1 Measure 3 added section 10 to Article XV of the Oregon Constitution. Section 10 consists of 12 subsections. Plaintiffs argued that Measure 3 contains two or more constitutional amendments that should have been voted on separately under Article XVII, section 1, of the Oregon Constitution.2 Plaintiffs also argued that Measure 3 addresses more than one subject, in violation of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Lehman v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Californians for an Open Primary v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Scott v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Lincoln Interagency Narcotics Team v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Meyer v. BradburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Californians for an Open Primary v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API