Scott v. Jackson County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
•MEMORANDUM *
We must decide whether, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the seizure of several hundred rabbits by county animal control officers violated a criminal defendant’s rights under the United States Constitution and Oregon tort law.
I
The parties are aware of the facts, and we will not recite them in detail here. Diane Scott filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon alleging constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and various state law claims under the Oregon Property Protection Act (“OPPA”) and the Oregon Tort Claims Act (“OTCA”).…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Devereaux v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Joe Lowell McElyea Jr. v. Governor Bruce BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Doran v. 7-Eleven, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Scott v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- (PC) Houston v. KuppingerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PC) Houston v. KuppingerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Agro Dynamics, LLC v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Govt App Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.