Lehman v. Bradbury
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, ORS 28.010 et seq., and ORS 246.910(1), 1 challenging the constitutionality of Ballot Measure 3 (1992) (Measure 3 or “Term Limits Initiative”). 2 Among other things, Measure 3 added to Article II of the Oregon Constitution section 19 (setting limits on the terms for most statewide political officeholders and for state legislators) and section 20 (setting limits on the terms of Oregon members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate). Plaintiffs argued that Measure 3 contains two or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Dale v. KeislingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
3Cited by27 opinions
- Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Cole v. State Ex Rel. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.