Californians for an Open Primary v. McPherson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*738Opinion
GEORGE, C. J.
We granted review to address an issue of first impression: the proper interpretation of California Constitution, article XVIII, section 1 (article XVIII, section 1), which requires in its second sentence that when the Legislature proposes an amendment of the state Constitution, “[e]ach amendment shall be so prepared and submitted that it can be voted on separately.”
We conclude, as did the Court of Appeal below, and consistent with our provision’s language and history and more than a century of out-of-state decisions construing the essentially identical provisions of nearly…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People ex rel. Elder v. SoursSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Fair Political Practices Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Strauss v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Perry v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Meyer v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.