Legal Opinion

Californians for an Open Primary v. McPherson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2006No. S126780PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*738Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

We granted review to address an issue of first impression: the proper interpretation of California Constitution, article XVIII, section 1 (article XVIII, section 1), which requires in its second sentence that when the Legislature proposes an amendment of the state Constitution, “[e]ach amendment shall be so prepared and submitted that it can be voted on separately.”

We conclude, as did the Court of Appeal below, and consistent with our provision’s language and history and more than a century of out-of-state decisions construing the essentially identical provisions of nearly…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. People ex rel. Elder v. SoursSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  4. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Fair Political Practices Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Strauss v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Perry v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Meyer v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API