Legal Opinion

Outcault Advertising Co. v. Jones

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, C. J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal upon the ground that the plaintiff’s cause was an action for money and damages only, and that the amount involved was less than $250 and therefore within the prohibition of Section 548, Or. L., as amended by Chapter 153, G-eneral Laws of Oregon for 1923, which is as follows:

“Sec. 548. Judgment or Decree, When Appeal-able. A judgment or decree may be reviewed on appeal as prescribed in this chapter and not otherwise. An order affecting a substantial right, and which in effect determines the action or suit so as to prevent a judgment or decree therein, or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Libby v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Moss v. WoodcockOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Drinker v. Ritter, Lowe & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Outcault Advertising Co. v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heise v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Farmers & Merchants State Bank, an Idaho Banking Corporation v. Western Bank, an Oregon Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Kubeck v. Consolidated UnderwritersOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Mountain Fir Lumber Co. v. Employee Benefits Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Haag v. CembellinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API