Legal Opinion

Outcault Advertising Co. v. Jones

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

On the Merits.

This cause was started as an action at law to recover the sum of $109.20 claimed by the plaintiff from the defendant on a contract for the lease of advertising material. A similar contract is set out in full in Outcault Advertising Company v. Buell, 71 Or. 52 (141 Pac. 1021). The defendant filed an answer denying the material allegations of the complaint and set up an affirmative defense alleging fraud in the inception of the contract and prays for the cancellation thereof. The reply denies the affirmative defense. The case was tried as a suit in equity. The decree was rendered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Linington v. StrongIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. McCabe v. KelleherOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Davis v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Foss v. NewburyOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hetrick v. Gerlinger Motor Car Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Outcault Advertising Co. v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API