Legal Opinion

Kubeck v. Consolidated Underwriters

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1974PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover under the theft loss provision of his automobile insurance policy issued by defendant. Defendant’s answer alleged that the policy had been issued in reliance on plaintiff’s material misrepresentation that the car .in question was a standard 1969 Ford Fairlane. In fact, the automobile was a high performance 1969 Ford Fair-lane Cobra which defendant contended' it would not have-'insured'had-it known the :trne facts.. The court sitting without a jury granted judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

The two assignments of error question the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Krause v. Eugene Dodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Lilienthal v. KaufmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Coleman v. MeyerOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Horner v. WagyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Johnson v. CoferOregon Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bodenhamer v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. United States Nat. Bank of Oregon v. FoughtOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Farmers & Merchants State Bank, an Idaho Banking Corporation v. Western Bank, an Oregon Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Omaha National Bank v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Thomas v. InmanOregon Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API