Legal Opinion
Hartline v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 23, 2002No. 01-7078PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
The parties have raised two main issues on appeal. The first is whether a transferee court is bound by the substantive law of the transferor court when a federal law claim is transferred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The second is whether the actions taken by the appellees with respect to the multiemployer pension plan were actions subject to review under the fiduciary duty provisions found in section 404(a)(1) of ERISA. See 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(1).
For the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion of May 4, 1999, we affirm the…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINKSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- In Re KOREAN AIR LINES DISASTER OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1983. Appeal of Plaintiffs Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Hartline v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension FundDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Sierra Club v. FlowersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Janese v. FayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Cement & Concrete Workers District Council Pension Fund v. Ulico Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Moore v. Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Mesa Power Group, LLC v. Government of CanadaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.