Legal Opinion
Cement & Concrete Workers District Council Pension Fund v. Ulico Casualty Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 13, 2005No. 02-CV-5506 (NGG)(VVP)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GARAUFIS, District Judge.
On June 2, 2005, Magistrate Judge Po-horelsky issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommending that this court grant defendant Ulico Casualty Company’s (“Ulico”) motion for summary judgment in this action. The plaintiffs submitted a timely statement of objections to the Report, thereby requiring this court to make a de novo review of all portions of the Report to which the plaintiffs specifically objected. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Having so reviewed Judge Pohorelsky’s Report, I adopt his recommendations in their entirety…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Beacon Associates LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Federal Insurance v. International Business MacHines Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Janese v. FayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Pender v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2010
- Cement & Concrete Workers District Council Pension Fund v. Ulico Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.