Legal Opinion

Phelps Ex Rel. City of Findlay v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1924No. 18434PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

An examination of the pleadings filed in this case discloses that the same relate to rates to be charged for telephone service in the city of Findlay. The case was submitted to be considered at the same time as case No. 18121, City of Findlay v. Public Utilities Commission, post, 827.

The petition herein was filed June 15, 1923, and three days before, on June 12, 1923, and in said cause No. 18121, City of Findlay v. Public Utilities Commission, all questions touching the rates for telephone service, rights under ordinances and franchises, were adjudicated by the Public Utilities…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Wall Paper Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State, Ex Rel. City of Cininnati. v. GeigerOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API