Legal Opinion

Bowes v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1930No. 22568PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The plaintiff in error, Bowes, seeks to have this finding of the Industrial Commission reviewed by virtue of the provisions of Section 871-38, General Code, which provides, in substance, that any employer or other person in interest being dissatisfied with any order of the commission may commence an action in the Supreme Court of Ohio to set aside, vacate, or amend the same, on the ground that the order is unreasonable or unlawful. This provision of the General Code is found in what is known as the Safety Code,” Sections 871-1 to 871-45, inclusive, and relates to the right given any person…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Slatmeyer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nichols v. GregoryOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. Industrial Commission of Ohio.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. United States Wall Paper Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API