Legal Opinion
Gangemi v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 2, 2001No. SC 16208PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether the continued maintenance of a certain “no rental” condition imposed on a zoning variance granted to the plaintiffs in 1986 by the defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Fairfield (board), which the plaintiffs did not challenge by direct appeal at that time, violates the public policy against restraints against alienation of property. The plaintiffs, Sebastian Gangemi and Rebecca J. Gangemi, appeal, pursuant to our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kirsch Holding Co. v. Borough of ManasquanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Reid v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Upjohn Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Levesque v. D & M BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Peiter v. DegenringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Dilullo v. JosephSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Ward v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- City of Torrington v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Horace v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.