Martin v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Field, J. Const., Sec. 3, Art. I. And that a license is property, citing: Dorman v. State, 34 Ala., 239. Stevens v. State, 2 Ark., 299. Plummer v. Com., 1 Bush., 26. 1 Dillon Mun. Corp., Sec. 280. Com. v. Moylan, 119 Mass., 109. State v. Snow, 3 Rhode Island, 74. Heise v. Town Council, 6 Rich., 404. Columbus v. Outcomp, 17 N. W. R., 47." Metropolitan Board v. Barrie, 34 N. Y., 657. State, ex rel.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Field, J. Const., Sec. 3, Art. I. And that a license is property, citing: Dorman v. State, 34 Ala., 239. Stevens v. State, 2 Ark., 299. Plummer v. Com., 1 Bush., 26. 1 Dillon Mun. Corp., Sec. 280. Com. v. Moylan, 119 Mass., 109. State v. Snow, 3 Rhode Island, 74. Heise v. Town Council, 6 Rich., 404. Columbus v. Outcomp, 17 N. W. R., 47." Metropolitan Board v. Barrie, 34 N. Y., 657. State, ex rel. City of York, v. Babcoclc, 20 Neb., 522.
1Opinion of the Court
Reese, Ch. J.
Plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquors in violation of law, not having a license therefor. The principal part of the evidence submitted on the trial was contained in a stipulation of facts, which we here copy:
“ It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties to this action, that this cause be submitted upon the following statement of facts:
*373“1. It is agreed that the defendant, George Martin, received a license from the city of Lincoln, Nebraska, duly issued, in accordance with the law, empowering him to sell liquor (commonly…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Metropolitan Board of Excise v. . BarrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Pleuler v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
- People v. CoghillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Kupfer v. Inhabitants of the South Parish in AugustaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
- Columbus City v. CutcompSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- City of Grand Rapids v. BraudyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- State Ex Rel. Zugravu v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- State v. Central Lumber Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Gillesby v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.